Maybe We Should Take the North Koreans at Their Word Tikkun.org
Yet Republicans?
(Bring the moral ground back to earth, Senator Graham)
(Quibbling over meanings: Making over interpreting law and policy. *
The issue is the use of words and the foundation of our nation on the constitution for the purpose of justice for the people. After that it takes a village idiot and a dictionary. There are only three branches of government. None supreme, but they have their separations in the constitution after that "it is not a location" but it is out there. There is no department of interpretation, but the courts do decide and the rest must interpret. That all three branches make law is a valid charge in their following it or not and the process keeping up.)
* punctuation neutral but bold links have been fully read and recommended if not bluntly. It must be remembered that any justice, executive or legislator can say anything, but it is the court that answers the question of law whether it is 5-4 or 8-1 and understood or followed or not.
[ 6-2-09: Not what I meant, exactly. ]
[ 6-9-09: No. Newt ]
1 comment:
It is my opinion, not being a lawyer but having followed the quibbling for over 35 years, that Newt Gingrich has set up a straw man I have yet to fully follow the needle to thread. See meanings link for his YouTube lecture: Judicial Supremacy vs. Co-equal Branches, Lecture 1
Post a Comment